Proteomic correlates of cortical thickness in cognitively normal individuals with normal and abnormal cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid1-42
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cortical atrophy is an early feature of Alzheimer´s disease (AD). The biological processes associated with variability in cortical thickness remain largely unknown. We studied 220 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteins to evaluate biological pathways associated with cortical thickness in 34 brain regions in 79 cognitively normal older individuals with normal (>192 ng/L, n = 47), and abnormal (≤192 ng/L, n = 32) CSF beta-amyloid1-42 (Aβ42). Interactions for Aβ42 status were tested. Panther GeneOntology and Cytoscape ClueGO analyses were used to evaluate biological processes associated with regional cortical thickness. 170 (77.3 %) proteins related with cortical thickness in at least 1 brain region across the total group, and 171 (77.7 %) proteins showed Aβ42 specific associations. Higher levels of proteins related to axonal and synaptic integrity, amyloid accumulation, and inflammation were associated with thinner cortex in lateral temporal regions, the rostral anterior cingulum, the lateral occipital cortex and the pars opercularis only in the abnormal Aβ42 group. Alterations in CSF proteomics are associated with a regional cortical atrophy in the earliest stages of AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".