MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186390505 · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24677-6

Lineage-defined leiomyosarcoma subtypes emerge years before diagnosis and determine patient survival

2021· article· en· W3186390505 on OpenAlexafffund
Nathaniel D. Anderson, Yael Babichev, Fabio Fuligni, Federico Comitani, Mehdi Layeghifard, Rosemarie E. Venier, Stefan C. Dentro, Anant Maheshwari, Sheena Guram, Claire Wunker, John Thompson, Kyoko E. Yuki, Huayun Hou, Matthew Zatzman, Nicholas Light, Marcus Q. Bernardini, Jay S. Wunder, Irene L. Andrulis, Peter C. Ferguson, Albiruni R. Abdul Razak, Carol J. Swallow, James J. Dowling, Rima Al‐awar, Richard Marcellus, Marjan Rouzbahman, Moritz Gerstung, Daniel Durocher, Ludmil B. Alexandrov, Brendan C. Dickson, Rebecca A. Gladdy, Adam Shlien

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai HospitalHospital for Sick Children
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoSt. Baldrick's Foundation
KeywordsBiologySubtypingHomologous recombinationLeiomyosarcomaGenomeSomatic evolution in cancerTranscriptomeLineage (genetic)CRISPRPhylogenetic treeCancer researchComputational biologyBioinformaticsGeneticsGenePathologyMedicineGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) are genetically heterogeneous tumors differentiating along smooth muscle lines. Currently, LMS treatment is not informed by molecular subtyping and is associated with highly variable survival. While disease site continues to dictate clinical management, the contribution of genetic factors to LMS subtype, origins, and timing are unknown. Here we analyze 70 genomes and 130 transcriptomes of LMS, including multiple tumor regions and paired metastases. Molecular profiling highlight the very early origins of LMS. We uncover three specific subtypes of LMS that likely develop from distinct lineages of smooth muscle cells. Of these, dedifferentiated LMS with high immune infiltration and tumors primarily of gynecological origin harbor genomic dystrophin deletions and/or loss of dystrophin expression, acquire the highest burden of genomic mutation, and are associated with worse survival. Homologous recombination defects lead to genome-wide mutational signatures, and a corresponding sensitivity to PARP trappers and other DNA damage response inhibitors, suggesting a promising therapeutic strategy for LMS. Finally, by phylogenetic reconstruction, we present evidence that clones seeding lethal metastases arise decades prior to LMS diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207