Research on the Construction of Quality Evaluation Index System of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Colleges and Universities-Based on Four Local Colleges and Universities in Shiyan City
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the local universities in Shiyan City, we use the literature method to determine and construct the evaluation index system of local innovation and entrepreneurship quality in Shiyan City. The primary index is the quality of innovation and entrepreneurship education, the secondary index contains the innovation and entrepreneurship support and foundation link, the process and development link and the effect link, and the tertiary index is expanded in detail on the basis of the secondary index, mainly by the government, society, school and students. A total of sixteen levels are included. Based on the data of relevant indicators obtained from the questionnaire, the quality of innovation and entrepreneurship education in Shiyan city colleges and universities is analyzed empirically and objectively through simple descriptive analysis, from which problems are found, and corresponding suggestions and strategies are proposed for the problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it