MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Revisiting Heavy-Hitter Detection on Commodity Programmable Switches

2021· article· en· W3186416444 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Zhe Khooi, Levente Csikor, Jialin Li, Min Suk Kang, Dinil Mon Divakaran

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
FundersNational Research Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceReset (finance)TRACE (psycholinguistics)Forwarding planeResource (disambiguation)State (computer science)CommodityDistributed computingReal-time computingComputer networkAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Existing in-network heavy-hitter detection algorithms suffer from several shortcomings. On the one hand, most of the algorithms perform monitoring in intervals and reset the data structures in between; consequently, a notable amount of heavy hitters (HH) spanning across the intervals go undetected. On the other hand, the algorithms consume substantial hardware resources, potentially hindering other data plane functionalities to be integrated on the same device.In this work, we revisit the state-of-the-art in-network approaches in this regard and identify that they fall short in over-coming the aforementioned issues. In particular, we investigate whether it is possible to design a heavy-hitter detection algorithm that provides high accuracy without consuming substantial re-sources, thereby making it feasible to integrate with concurrent applications. To this end, we propose dSketch, a time-decaying algorithm for in-network heavy-hitter detection. Trace-driven simulations and evaluations on the Intel Tofino-based commodity switches show that dSketch significantly improves the detection rate of HHs by 5–10% while being resource- and operation-efficient in contrast to state-of-the-art approaches. Moreover, we show that dSketch can be integrated with standard switch functionalities such as switch. p4 with additional resources spared, offering itself as a compelling solution for switch data plane designers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207