MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186455109 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2021-0078

The truncate soft-shell clam, <i>Mya truncata</i> , as a biomonitor of municipal wastewater exposure and historical anthropogenic impacts in the Canadian Arctic

2021· article· en· W3186455109 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Christina M. Schaefer, David Deslauriers, Ken M. Jeffries

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWastewaterEffluentArcticEnvironmental chemistryBiogeochemical cycleEnvironmental scienceSewage treatmentBiologyEcologyEnvironmental engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Municipal wastewater is a large source of pollution to Canadian waters, yet its effects on Arctic marine ecosystems remains relatively unknown. We characterized the impacts of municipal wastewater from a growing northern community, Iqaluit, Nunavut, on the Arctic truncate soft-shell clam, Mya truncata. Clams were sampled from six locations that varied in proximity to the wastewater treatment plant, and shell biogeochemical analysis revealed that clams nearest the wastewater treatment plant had slower growth rates, lower carbon and oxygen stable isotope ratios, and elevated concentrations of copper and lead. A parallel analysis on mRNA expression profiles characterized M. truncata’s physiological response to wastewater effluent. Clams nearest the wastewater treatment plant had significantly lower mRNA expression of genes associated with metabolism, antioxidants, molecular chaperones, and phase I and II detoxification, but had heightened mRNA expression in genes coding for enzymes that bind and remove contaminants. These results demonstrated a biological response to Iqaluit’s wastewater effluent and highlight M. truncata’s potential to act as a biomonitor of municipal wastewater along Arctic coastlines in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesFrench-language works237,207