MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186489996 · doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.713178

Validation of Single Nucleotide Variant Assays for Human Leukocyte Antigen Haplotypes HLA-B*15:02 and HLA-A*31:01 Across Diverse Ancestral Backgrounds

2021· article· en· W3186489996 on OpenAlexafffund
Amanda Buchner, Xiuying Hu, Katherine J. Aitchison

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Pharmacology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta InnovatesMinistry of Innovation and Advanced EducationCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of AlbertaAlberta Precision Laboratories
KeywordsHuman leukocyte antigenHaplotypeTaqManHLA-BFalse positive paradoxBiologyGeneticsImmunologyAntigenAlleleGenePolymerase chain reaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The human leukocyte antigen haplotypes HLA-B*15:02 and HLA-A*31:01 have been linked to life-threatening adverse drug reactions to the anticonvulsants carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine. Identification of these haplotypes via pharmacogenetic techniques facilitates implementation of precision medicine to prevent such reactions. Using reference samples from diverse ancestral origins, we investigated the test analytical validity (i.e., ability to detect whether or not the haplotypes were present or absent) of TaqMan assays for single nucleotide variants previously identified as potentially being able to “tag” these haplotypes. A TaqMan custom assay for rs10484555 and an inventoried assay for rs17179220 and were able to identify with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity HLA-B*15:02 and HLA-A*31:01 respectively. A custom assay for rs144012689 that takes into account a neighboring single nucleotide variant with manual calling was also able to identify HLA-B*15:02 with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. A custom assay for rs1061235 identified HLA-A*31:01 with 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity. The slight reduction in specificity for the latter was owing to another haplotype (HLA-A*33:03) also being detected. While any positive call using the rs1061235 assay could therefore be further investigated, as the presence of the HLA-A*31:01 haplotype confers adverse drug reaction risk, the absence of false negatives (indexed by sensitivity) is more important than false positives. In summary, we present validated TaqMan assay methodology for efficient detection of HLA haplotypes HLA-B*15:02 and HLA-A*31:01 . Our data are relevant for other genotyping technologies that identify, or have the potential to identify, these haplotypes using single nucleotide variants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PharmacologySame topicDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFrench-language works237,207