MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186500181 · doi:10.1111/eve.13523

Neoplasia within the equine foot: A retrospective case series of four horses

2021· article· en· W3186500181 on OpenAlex
Craig Osborne, Y Elce, L. Meehan, Alec J. Davern, Timothy B. Lescun

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEquine Veterinary Education · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Equine Medical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLamenessHoofPhalanxFoot (prosody)RadiographyPresentation (obstetrics)Retrospective cohort studyPathologicalPhysical examinationRadiologySurgeryPathologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Background Trauma to the foot and distal phalanx are common presenting complaints. In contrast, neoplasia of the distal phalanx or hoof region is rarely reported. Within the foot, keratomas are the most frequently reported neoplasm. The gross and radiographic appearance of keratomas is well documented; however, this is less well established for other neoplasms of the hoof capsule. Objective This paper presents four cases which had clinical and radiographic similarities to keratomas; however, key differences were observed. We aimed to highlight the key differences in imaging findings and clinical progression. Study design Retrospective multicentre case series. Methods Cases identified between 2015 and 2019 with pathological diagnoses of neoplasia within the foot at Purdue University Veterinary teaching hospital and Langford Equine Hospital. Clinical records were examined, and physical examination, imaging, surgical and pathological findings are presented. Results The four cases presented had similarities to keratomas; however, key differences were present. Marked lameness was noted in all three cases with aggressive neoplasia, whereas one case was not lame at presentation but still had a diagnosis of a benign neoplasm. Radiographic examination showed significant lucent areas with poor delineation at the margins and suspected invasion into the distal phalanx. For the two melanomas and the squamous cell carcinoma, deterioration was marked and rapid, ultimately leading to euthanasia. The benign neoplasm was managed successfully for 2 years and lost to follow‐up. Conclusions Although rare, neoplasms other than keratoma do occur in the foot. Careful interpretation of the imaging findings, consideration of additional imaging such as vascular studies or cross‐sectional imaging, and submission of tissue for biopsy are strongly recommended if there is any suspicion of the lesion being anything other than a keratoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it