Genome-Wide Detection of Imprinted Differentially Methylated Regions Using Nanopore Sequencing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Imprinting is a critical part of normal embryonic development in mammals, controlled by defined parent-of-origin (PofO) differentially methylated regions (DMRs) known as imprinting control regions. As we and others have shown, direct nanopore sequencing of DNA provides a mean to detect allelic methylation and to overcome the drawbacks of methylation array and short-read technologies. Here we leverage publicly-available nanopore sequence data for 12 standard B-lymphocyte cell lines to present the first genome-wide mapping of imprinted intervals in humans using this technology. We were able to phase 95% of the human methylome and detect 94% of the well-characterized imprinted DMRs. In addition, we found 28 novel imprinted DMRs (12 germline and 16 somatic), which we confirmed using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) data. Analysis of WGBS data in mus musculus, rhesus macaque, and chimpanzee suggested that 12 of these are conserved. We also detected subtle parental methylation bias spanning several kilobases at seven known imprinted clusters. These results expand the current state of knowledge of imprinting, with potential applications in the clinic. We have also demonstrated that nanopore long reads, can reveal imprinting using only parent-offspring trios, as opposed to the large multi - generational pedigrees that have previously been required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".