MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3186931431 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.125114

Single particle properties of the two-dimensional Hubbard model for real frequencies at weak coupling: Breakdown of the Dyson series for partial self-energy expansions

2021· article· en· W3186931431 on OpenAlexafffund
B. D. E. McNiven, G. Todd Andrews, J. P. F. LeBlanc

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCompute Canada
KeywordsHubbard modelPseudogapSeries (stratigraphy)Series expansionPhysicsCoupling (piping)Function (biology)Square latticeLattice (music)Order (exchange)Self-energyQuantum mechanicsStatistical physicsMathematical physicsMathematical analysisMathematicsSuperconductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We generate the perturbative expansion of the single particle Green's function and related self-energy for a half-filled single-band Hubbard model on a square lattice. We invoke algorithmic Matsubara integration to evaluate single-particle quantities for real and Matsubara frequencies and verify results through comparison to existing data on the Matsubara axis. With low-order expansions at weak coupling we observe a number of outcomes expected at higher orders: the opening of a gap, pseudogap behavior, and Fermi-surface reconstruction. Based on low-order perturbations, we consider the phase diagram that arises from truncated expansions of the self-energy and Green's function and their relation via the Dyson equation. From Matsubara axis data, we observe insulating behavior in direct expansions of the Green's function, whereas the same order of truncation of the self-energy produces metallic behavior. This observation is supported by additional calculations for real frequencies. We attribute this difference to the order in which diagrams are implicitly summed in the Dyson series. By separating the reducible and irreducible contributions at each order we show that the reducible diagrams implicitly summed in the Dyson equation lead to incorrect physics in the half-filled Hubbard model. Our observations for this particular case lead us to question the utility of the Dyson equation for any problem that shows a disparity between reducible and irreducible contributions to the expansion of the Green's function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207