Durability Characterization of a High Performance Building Envelope with Vacuum Insulation Panels and Energy Recovery Ventilation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vacuum insulation panels (VIPs) can help achieve thin, highly insulated building envelopes, but poor implementation and insufficient ventilation can lead to durability issues. This thesis describes a field study that was used to characterize the durability of a research house with a thin, VIP-integrated building envelope and an energy recovery ventilator (ERV). The study employed long term hygrothermal monitoring of the building envelope and various tests to evaluate the insulation performance, airtightness, and ventilation effectiveness. The impacts of VIPs and ventilation on durability were discussed, with emphasis on moisture buffering, drying potential, mold growth risk, and VIP aging. The house demonstrated exceptional insulation performance with no risk of visible mold growth during the study. The walls and floor showed acceptable conditions for VIP longevity, and the ERV showed a potential to sufficiently buffer indoor moisture loads. Recommendations were provided to improve the durability and efficiency of the house.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".