Optical and Photocatalytic Properties of CuxS/ZnO Composite Thin Films Deposited by Robotic Spray Pyrolysis Deposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article reports on VIS-active composite thin films based on zinc oxide (ZnO) and copper sulfide (CuxS) deposited using robotic spray pyrolysis deposition (SPD) for the study of the optical and photocatalytic properties. The first step involves the SPD deposition of a CuxS layer onto the glass substrate at 300°C. The second step consists of the deposition of a ZnO layer onto the CuxS layer to form glass/CuxS-ZnO composites that were further annealed at 400°C. The development of the composite thin films was confirmed by XRD and EDX analyses. The band gap energy ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:msub> <a:mrow> <a:mi>E</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mtext>g</a:mtext> </a:mrow> </a:msub> </a:math> ) of the bare ZnO thin films decreased from 3.15 eV to an activation energy value of 2.8 eV after the deposition of the ZnO thin layer onto the CuxS layer and from 2.8 to 2.08 eV after annealing the CuxS-ZnO composite at 400°C. The UV-VIS irradiation (5.5% of UV, <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:mi>G</c:mi> <c:mo>=</c:mo> <c:mn>55</c:mn> <c:mtext> </c:mtext> <c:mtext>W</c:mtext> <c:mo>/</c:mo> <c:msup> <c:mrow> <c:mtext>m</c:mtext> </c:mrow> <c:mrow> <c:mn>2</c:mn> </c:mrow> </c:msup> </c:math> ) of a 10 ppm methylene blue solution was used to investigate the photocatalytic properties of the CuxS-ZnO composites. The annealed CuxS-ZnO thin films at 400°C demonstrates better photocatalytic activity compared to CuxS-ZnO composites deposited at 300°C. The enhanced photocatalytic efficiency of the annealed CuxS-ZnO thin films may be the result of the diode structure and the increased crystallinity that prevent the electron-hole recombination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".