<i>Saccothecium sepincola</i> . [Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A description is provided for Saccothecium sepincola . Some information on its dispersal and transmission and conservation status is given, along with details of its geographical distribution (Morocco, Canada (British Columbia), USA (Florida, North Carolina, Oregon, Virginia, Washington), Chile, Armenia, Republic of Georgia, India (Uttar Pradesh), Pakistan, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia-Hercegovina, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia (Leningradskaya oblast), Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine and UK), hosts ( Aruncus sylvestris, Celtis planchoniana, Cornus sanguinea, Cornus sp., Corylus avellana, Crataegus laevigata, Crataegus pojarkoviae, Elaeagnus angustifolia, Forsythia intermedia, Hippophae rhamnoides, Laurus nobilis, Philadelphus sp., Pistacia mutica, Populus tremula, Rosa canina, Rosa centifolia, Rosa moschata, Rosa multiflora, Rosa pendulina, Rosa trachyphylla, Rosa sp., Rubus amoenus, Rubus discolor, Rubus floridus, Rubus fruticosus, Rubus idaeus, Rubus laciniatus, Rubus leucodermis, Rubus grabowskii, Rubus villicaulis, Rubus sp., Physocarpus opulifolius, Spiraea salicifolia and Staphylea pinnata ) and associated fungi ( Leptosphaeria fuscella, Valsa ceratosperma, Valsa ambiens and Valsa sp.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".