MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Data Augmentation for Intrusion Detection and Classification in Cloud Networks

2021· article· en· W3187158089 on OpenAlexaff
Zina Chkirbene, Habib Ben Abdallah, Kawther Hassine, Ridha Hamila, Aiman Erbad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Security and Intrusion Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDiscriminatorCloud computingFlexibility (engineering)Intrusion detection systemMachine learningArtificial intelligenceData miningOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud computing is a paradigm that provides multiple services over the internet with high flexibility in a cost-effective way. However, the growth of cloud-based services comes with major security issues. Recently, machine learning techniques are gaining much interest in security applications as they exhibit fast processing capabilities with real-time predictions. One major challenge in the implementation of these techniques is the available training data for each new potential attack category. In this paper, we propose a new model for secure network based on machine learning algorithms. The proposed model ensures better learning of minority classes using Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) architecture. In particular, the new model optimizes the GAN parameter including the number of inner learning steps for the discriminator to balance the training datasets. Then, the optimized GAN generates highly informative “like real” instances to be appended to the original data which improve the detection of the classes with relatively small training data. Our experimental results show that the proposed approach enhances the overall classification performance and detection accuracy even for the rarely detectable classes for both UNSW and NSL-KDD datasets. The simulation results show also that the proposed model could detect better the network attacks compared to the state-of-art techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionFrench-language works237,207