MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3187757046 · doi:10.1159/000516774

The Role of Apolipoprotein E ε4 in Early and Late Mild Cognitive Impairment

2021· article· en· W3187757046 on OpenAlex
Yulin Luo, Li Tan, Joseph Therriault, Hua Zhang, Ying Gao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Neurology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute on AgingCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsApolipoprotein ECognitionAlzheimer's diseaseInternal medicineMedicinePsychologyNeuroimagingCognitive impairmentNeuroscienceEndocrinologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Apolipoprotein E (<i>APOE</i>) ε4 is highly associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, the specific influence of <i>APOE</i> ε4 status on tau pathology and cognitive decline in early MCI (EMCI) and late MCI (LMCI) is poorly understood. Our goal was to evaluate the association of <i>APOE</i> ε4 with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tau levels and cognition in EMCI and LMCI patients in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database, and whether this association was mediated by amyloid-β (Aβ). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Participants were 269 cognitively normal (CN), 262 EMCI, and 344 LMCI patients. They underwent CSF Aβ42 and tau detection, <i>APOE</i> ε4 genotyping, Mini-Mental State Examination, (MMSE), and Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale (ADAS)-cog assessments. Linear regressions were used to examine the relation of <i>APOE</i> ε4 and CSF tau levels and cognitive scores in persons with and without Aβ deposition (Aβ+ and Aβ−). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The prevalence of <i>APOE</i> ε4 is higher in EMCI and LMCI than in CN (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for both), and in LMCI than in EMCI (<i>p</i> = 0.001). <i>APOE</i> ε4 allele was significantly higher in Aβ+ subjects than in Aβ− subjects (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Subjects who had a lower CSF Aβ42 level and were <i>APOE</i> ε4-positive experienced higher levels of CSF tau and cognitive scores in EMCI and/or LMCI. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> An <i>APOE</i> ε4 allele is associated with increased CSF tau and worse cognition in both EMCI and LMCI, and this association may be mediated by Aβ. We conclude that <i>APOE</i> ε4 may be an important mediator of tau pathology and cognition in the early stages of AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it