MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3187961083 · doi:10.1002/cm.21684

The actin‐binding protein Adseverin mediates neutrophil polarization and migration

2021· article· en· W3187961083 on OpenAlexaff
Judah Glogauer, Chunxiang Sun, Yongqiang Wang, Michael Glogauer

Bibliographic record

VenueCytoskeleton · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemotaxisGelsolinBiologyCell biologyActinActin-binding proteinActin remodelingProtein filamentMDia1Actin cytoskeletonCytoskeletonBiochemistryCellReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through the process of chemotactic migration, neutrophils are able to recruit to an inflammatory site and eliminate pathogens, thus playing a vital role in host defense. The process of neutrophil chemotaxis is mediated by dynamic actin reorganization and polymerization. Adseverin, an actin-binding protein and member of the Gelsolin superfamily of proteins, has been hypothesized to regulate goal directed movement through the capping and severing of actin filaments, but has never been investigated in the context of neutrophil chemotaxis. Using an Adseverin knockout mouse model, we show that Adseverin plays a role in subcortical F-actin assembly at the leading edge during chemotaxis through the generation of free barbed ends on existing actin filaments. In addition, in the absence of Adseverin, neutrophils show reduced speed of migration in vitro and in vivo. This study indicates that Adseverin is a regulator of actin filament generation during neutrophil chemotaxis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCytoskeletonSame topicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative MechanismsFrench-language works237,207