Diastolic hypertension is associated with proteinuria in pediatric patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background and Aims Blood pressure lability has been observed in certain cohorts of pediatric patients with variable degrees of proteinuria; however, the impact of proteinuria on blood pressure is not fully elucidated. The objective of our study was to analyze blood pressure and heart rate in pediatric patients with proteinuria. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients (age 1‐18) diagnosed with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, with varying degrees of proteinuria. Blood pressure and heart rate data were analyzed in relation to anthropometric and biochemical parameters. A total of 72 urine sample analyses, along with associated blood pressure measurements, were obtained from the charts of 33 children (males = 25). Results Diastolic blood pressure Z ‐scores were significantly higher in proteinuric patients (urine protein/creatinine >0.02 g/mmol) compared to non‐proteinuric patients ( P = .006; Cohen‐ d 0.97 [0.41; 1.53]). Systolic blood pressure was also significantly higher in proteinuric patients ( P = .04), but with a less significant effect size (Cohen‐ d 0.54 [−0.002; 1.08]). Proteinuria (>0.02 g/mmol) was the most significant predictor of diastolic ( β = .79, P = .04), but not systolic blood pressure elevation on multivariate analysis. Conclusions We observed a disproportionate increase in diastolic blood pressure vs systolic blood pressure in patients with proteinuria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".