The stressosome, a caspase‐8‐activating signalling complex assembled in response to cell stress in an ATG5‐mediated manner
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Stress‐induced apoptosis is mediated primarily through the intrinsic pathway that involves caspase‐9. We previously reported that in caspase‐9‐deficient cells, a protein complex containing ATG5 and Fas‐associated death domain (FADD) facilitated caspase‐8 activation and cell death in response to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Here, we investigated whether this complex could be activated by other forms of cell stress. We show that diverse stress stimuli, including etoposide, brefeldin A and paclitaxel, as well as heat stress and gamma‐irradiation, caused formation of a complex containing ATG5‐ATG12, FADD and caspase‐8 leading to activation of downstream caspases in caspase‐9‐deficient cells. We termed this complex the ‘stressosome’. However, in these cells, only ER stress and heat shock led to stressosome‐dependent cell death. Using in silico molecular modelling, we propose the structure of the stressosome complex, with FADD acting as an adaptor protein, interacting with pro‐caspase‐8 through their respective death effector domains (DEDs) and interacting with ATG5‐ATG12 through its death domain (DD). This suggests that the complex could be regulated by cellular FADD‐like interleukin‐1β‐converting enzyme–inhibitory protein (cFLIPL), which was confirmed experimentally. This study provides strong evidence for an alternative mechanism of caspase‐8 activation involving the stressosome complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".