MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3188452948

The Evaluation of Yoga Interventions for Individuals With Limited Mobility: Pain, Psychological Variables, and Mindfulness

2018· article· en· W3188452948 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Kathryn Curtis

Bibliographic record

VenueYorkSpace (York University) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchToronto Rehabilitation InstituteOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareOntario Neurotrauma FoundationRick Hansen Institute
KeywordsMindfulnessPsychological interventionHatha yogaRepeated measures designPhysical therapyAnxietyMental healthRehabilitationClinical psychologyPsychologyRandomized controlled trialMixed-design analysis of varianceMedicineAnalysis of variancePsychotherapistPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: The aim of this dissertation was to evaluate specialized yoga interventions for populations with complex chronic health conditions involving chronic pain and limited mobility. \nMethod: Three research trials were conducted at two rehabilitation hospitals in Toronto. In Study 1, participants (N = 10) admitted to Bridgepoint Health were recruited to participate in an 8-week, Hatha yoga program. In Study 2, participants with spinal cord injury (SCI, N = 12) were recruited to participate in an 8-week, Hatha yoga program at the Lyndhurst Centre. In Study 3, participants with SCI (N = 23) were randomized to a 6-week, Iyengar yoga group (IY, n = 11) or to a wait-list control group (WLC, n = 12). Questionnaires on pain, psychological variables, and mindfulness, were collected at two or three points in time. \nResults: In Study 1, repeated measures ANOVAs revealed a main effect of time for anxiety, self-compassion, and the magnification aspect of pain catastrophizing, such that anxiety and pain catastrophizing decreased and self-compassion increased from pre- to post-intervention. In Study 2, there were no significant changes in the quantitative measures but qualitative analysis of the semi-structured interviews revealed main themes regarding benefits along emotional, mental and physical domains. In Study 3, linear mixed effects growth models were conducted to evaluate main effects of group at T2, controlling for T1 scores. Depression scores were lower and self-compassion scores were higher at T2 in the IY group compared to the WLC group. The two groups were combined and analyzed across time by comparing pre- and post-intervention scores. Main effects of time were found for depression scores, self-compassion, mindfulness (total score and subscale scores for mindful observing and mindful non-reactivity), such that depressive symptoms decreased and self-compassion and the various facets of mindfulness increased from pre- to post-intervention. \nDiscussion: The results from these studies show that a yoga program reduces depressive symptoms and increases self-compassion for individuals with SCI, and may also decrease anxiety and pain catastrophizing, and increase mindfulness for populations experiencing pain and limited mobility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYorkSpace (York University)Same topicMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsFrench-language works237,207