The Use of the Comma Sign and Tissue for Recognition, Reduction, and Stability During Arthroscopic Repair of Combined Anterosuperior Cuff Tears
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The comma sign is a useful marker for combined retracted supraspinatus and subscapularis tears. It was first described by the group of Burkhart as a "composite ligamentous structure" of the rotator interval attached to the retracted subscapularis. However, Neyton and coworkers suggested that the ruptured superior part of subscapularis is pulled upward by supraspinatus retraction. This video illustrates the value of "comma" recognition for reduction and repair stability. We feel that the comma tissue can be a composition of rotator interval ligaments with or without superior subscapularis contribution depending on an associated cleavage tear. Indications: Patients with retracted anterosuperior tears, unless muscle quality is poor (Goutallier classification ≥3). Understanding of the comma tissue is difficult but of crucial importance to assess complex anterosuperior cuff tears for reduction and repair with stability by maintaining and integrating this comma link into the repair construct. Technique Description: Arthroscopic setup includes beach chair position, armholder, cerebral saturation monitoring (target mean arterial blood pressure of about 70 mm Hg). Previously described circumferential portals were used for a repair with a double row construct (4 medial anchors: 2.5 for subscapularis; 1.5 for supraspinatus) and 2 lateral anchors. The superior boarder of subscapularis as well as the retracted capsular layer of supraspinatus was reduced and fixed using a lasso loop technique. Key stages are (1) tendon manipulation with 2 traction sutures; (2) tendon release; (3) comma reduction; (4) footprint preparation (burr, microfracture); (5) retrograde suture passing; (6) knot tying, knotless lateral row; and (7) a close surgeon to physiotherapist rehabilitation link (6 weeks passive to 90°, no resistance training for 3-6 months). Results: Senior author's (S.B.) series: 32 anterosuperior tears over 4 years (mean age: 62 years, 48-73 years), minimum follow-up 1 year showed good results (mean SSV: 85% [preop. 35%], range: 40%-95%; mean Constant: 82 [preop. 30], range: 40-90). One major complication (cutibacterium infection; brick layer; workers compensation; invalidity demand; Constant/Subjective Shoulder Value both 40) and minor temporary stiffness at 3 months (8 patients; 22%). Conclusion: Adequate reduction and comma integration into a solid repair construct, as well as responsible rehabilitation surveillance, deliver successful results after technically intricate anterosuperior repairs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".