MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3188494441 · doi:10.11575/prism/38940

The Role of the Business Dean in Comprehensive Community Colleges in Alberta

2021· dissertation· en· W3188494441 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Glenn Francis Dion Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Marketing Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManagementPolitical scienceEngineeringSociologyEngineering managementLibrary scienceComputer scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this case study was to explore the role of the dean of business in Comprehensive Community Colleges (CCCs) in Alberta. While there is an abundance of literature on the dean’s role in large, research-based institutions and a modest body of literature on the role in the college context, there appears to be a dearth of literature on the Alberta CCC business dean role. Within the available literature, the responsibilities and expectations for the decanal position remain unclear. The main research question was, “Is there clarity in the purpose of the role, tasks, and how the Dean of Business is assessed across the system in the province?” Perspectives on the role were examined through two different lenses, Vice Presidents, Academic (VPAs) and business deans working in an Alberta CCC at the time of the study. Participants responded to questions via two electronic questionnaires. Six deans and six VPAs participated in this study. This study found the following: • the dean’s ability to build trusting relationships is key to success; • the clarity of the term entrepreneurship, as it pertains to the decanal role, would reduce ambiguity of role; • deans do not always have portfolios entirely within their area of expertise; • further clarification of the dean’s role for stakeholders would support the dean’s success; • further clarity is required around decanal assessment; and • a common set of assessment criteria would be beneficial for deans and aspiring deans. A conclusion that can be drawn is that while currently there is a significant ambiguity surrounding the role of the Dean of Business in the Alberta CCC, there are processes and procedures that could be initiated in each of the diverse community colleges across Alberta to clarify the dean’s portfolio and establish performance criteria surrounding the role of the Dean of Business in the Alberta CCC. Keywords: comprehensive community college, regional stewardship, higher education

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0230.011
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicManagement and Marketing EducationFrench-language works237,207