A sequence-based global map of regulatory activity for deciphering human genetics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Sequence is at the basis of how the genome shapes chromatin organization, regulates gene expression, and impacts traits and diseases. Epigenomic profiling efforts have enabled large-scale identification of regulatory elements, yet we still lack a sequence-based map to systematically identify regulatory activities from any sequence, which is necessary for predicting the effects of any variant on these activities. We address this challenge with Sei, a new framework for integrating human genetics data with sequence information to discover the regulatory basis of traits and diseases. Our framework systematically learns a vocabulary for the regulatory activities of sequences, which we call sequence classes, using a new deep learning model that predicts a compendium of 21,907 chromatin profiles across >1,300 cell lines and tissues, the most comprehensive to-date. Sequence classes allow for a global view of sequence and variant effects by quantifying diverse regulatory activities, such as loss or gain of cell-type-specific enhancer function. We show that sequence class predictions are supported by experimental data, including tissue-specific gene expression, expression QTLs, and evolutionary constraints based on population allele frequencies. Finally, we applied our framework to human genetics data. Sequence classes uniquely provide a non-overlapping partitioning of GWAS heritability by tissue-specific regulatory activity categories, which we use to characterize the regulatory architecture of 47 traits and diseases from UK Biobank. Furthermore, the predicted loss or gain of sequence class activities suggest specific mechanistic hypotheses for individual regulatory pathogenic mutations. We provide this framework as a resource to further elucidate the sequence basis of human health and disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".