Patterns of heart rate and cardiac pausing in unrestrained resting decapod crustaceans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Measurement of heart rate (HR) has been used as an important physiological indicator in a broad range of taxa. In the present study HR patterns were measured in five species of unrestrained, resting decapod crustaceans. In addition to variation in HR among individuals, it was also very variable within an individual animal. While some of this variation was related to activity, there was also a non-locomotory component. Unstressed, resting crabs exhibited intermittent heart activity, whereas HR in stressed crabs was more stable, suggesting differential control of HR in resting crabs. Once the animals settled in the experimental apparatus they exhibited regular and extended cardiac pauses (acardia) of 15-300-s duration. As with HR, there was a significant variation in the frequency and length of acardic events, which were only observed in inactive crabs. Regaining of HR, following a period of acardia, was characterized by small adjustments in position and movement of the mouthparts. This rhythmic pattern, and the fact that entry into and out of acardia was not instantaneous, suggested that these events were related to release of neurohormones and their subsequent degradation in the system, rather than direct neural control of the heart. Because HR was variable and interrupted by regular periods of acardia, caution is recommended when calculating baseline levels of HR, or using HR alone as an indicator of physiological stress. Incorporating a coefficient of variation for HR and/or measuring the periods of acardia may be a more reliable indicator of physiological stress in decapod crustaceans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".