MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189007818 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggab315

Probabilistic inversion of seafloor compliance for oceanic crustal shear velocity structure using mixture density neural networks

2021· article· en· W3189007818 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephen Mosher, Z. Eilon, H. A. Janiszewski, Pascal Audet

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaComparative Gastroenterology SocietyMitacsUniversity of Hawai'iUniversity of OttawaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologySeismologySeafloor spreadingSeismometerInversion (geology)Shear (geology)Shear velocityCrustArtificial neural networkOceanic crustMantle (geology)GeophysicsGeodesyTectonicsSubductionMeteorologyPetrologyTurbulenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Measurements of various physical properties of oceanic sediment and crustal structures provide insight into a number of geological and geophysical processes. In particular, knowledge of the shear wave velocity (VS) structure of marine sediments and oceanic crust has wide ranging implications from geotechnical engineering projects to seismic mantle tomography studies. In this study, we propose a novel approach to nonlinearly invert compliance signals recorded by colocated ocean-bottom seismometers and high-sample-rate pressure gauges for shallow oceanic shear wave velocity structure. The inversion method is based on a type of machine learning neural network known as a mixture density neural network (MDN). We demonstrate the effectiveness of the MDN method on synthetic models with a fixed deployment depth of 2015 m and show that among 30 000 test models, the inverted shear wave velocity profiles achieve an average error of 0.025 km s−1. We then apply the method to observed data recorded by a broad-band ocean-bottom station in the Lau basin, for which a VS profile was estimated using Monte Carlo sampling methods. Using the mixture density network approach, we validate the method by showing that our VS profile is in excellent agreement with the previous result. Finally, we argue that the mixture density network approach to compliance inversion is advantageous over other compliance inversion methods because it is faster and allows for standardized measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207