MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189204686 · doi:10.1109/icc42927.2021.9500463

Structure-aware reinforcement learning for node-overload protection in mobile edge computing

2021· article· en· W3189204686 on OpenAlexafffund
Anirudha Jitani, Aditya Mahajan, Zhongwen Zhu, Hatem Abou-Zeid, Emmanuel Thepie Fapi, Hakimeh Purmehdi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)McGill University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceEdge computingLatency (audio)Distributed computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionMobile edge computingNode (physics)ServerComputer networkAdmission controlArtificial intelligenceQuality of serviceEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) refers to the concept of placing computational capability at the edge of the network to reduce the latency in handling the client requests. The performance of an edge server is adversely affected when it is overloaded, especially if it crashes due to overload and causes service failures. In this paper, a solution to prevent node from getting overloaded is analyzed by introducing an admission control policy. An adaptive admission control policy based low complexity RL (Reinforcement Learning) SALMUT (Structure-Aware Learning for Multiple Thresholds) is validated using several scenarios mimicking real world deployments. This approach performs as well as to the state-of-the-art deep RL algorithms such as PPO (Proximal Policy Optimization) and A2C (Advantage Actor Critic), but requires an order of magnitude less time to train, and outputs easily interpretable policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207