Role of the Structure and Reactivity of Cu and Ag Surfaces in the Formation of a 2D Metal–Hexahydroxytriphenylene Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide We have investigated the role played by the atomic structure and reactivity of the supporting Ag(111) and Cu(111) surfaces on the formation of 2D metal–organic networks (2D-MONs) involving metal adatom clusters spawned by these two surfaces. While the hexahydroxytriphenylene (HHTP) molecule forms complexes with Ag 3 and Cu 3 adatom clusters on, respectively, the Ag(111) and Cu(111) surfaces, an extended order is only observed in the 2D-MON on Ag(111). By combining scanning tunneling microscopy measurements, density functional theory calculations, and microscopy image simulations, we show that the formation of Ag–HHTP metal–organic complexes is structurally compatible with a periodic arrangement of HHTP on the Ag(111) surface. In contrast, on Cu(111), tightly bonded and localized Cu–HHTP motifs are stabilized by the interaction of Cu adclusters with HHTP. However, they cannot match the surface structure of Cu(111) to form an extended 2D-MON. We observed that the formation of large 2D-MON domains on a metallic surface is only possible when the periodicity of the adsorbed surface assembly is weakly perturbed by the addition of metal adclusters that reinforced the bonding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".