MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3189380859 · doi:10.3968/12153

From “Local” to “International”: Some Reflections on Translation Norms of Scenic Spot Introductions under the Context of Cultural Self-confidence in the New Era

2021· article· en· W3189380859 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wang Wei, Weihong Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStyle (visual arts)Context (archaeology)LinguisticsDomestication and foreignizationTranslation (biology)Set (abstract data type)DomesticationSociologyHistoryComputer sciencePhilosophyArchaeologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The current research surveys scenic spot introduction texts and summarizes the genre’s linguistic norms, which provide guiding principles for similar style’s Chinese-English translation. By adopting the set of translation and linguistic norms in the re-translation work of a local park in the City of Yantai, the translators attempt to prove that domestication could be a proper strategy when translating scenic spot introduction discourse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.054
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.071
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0540.071
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0170.057
Scholarly communication0.0160.012
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0040.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social science→Same topicTranslation Studies and Practices→French-language works237,207→