MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3189393415 · doi:10.2309/java-d-20-00036

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Children: A Prospective Single-Center Analysis of Associated Complications

2021· article· en· W3189393415 on OpenAlexaff
Filomena Canci Tavares, Maria AlBandari, John Donnellan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Association for Vascular Access · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcMaster Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCatheterComplicationPeripherally inserted central catheterSurgeryProspective cohort studyThrombosisSingle CenterTertiary referral hospitalRetrospective cohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highlights Overall, 72% (n = 63) of PICCs remained in situ until intended therapy was completed. In 24% (n = 21) of catheters, a PICC-associated complication resulted in premature removal. Leading all-cause complication was catheter malfunction (12% or 2.04 per 1000 catheter-days). Leading complication in uncuffed PICCs was catheter malfunction (4.12 per 1000 catheter-days). Leading complication in cuffed PICCs was infection (0.73 per 1000 catheter-days). Abstract Objective: To assess performance of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in pediatric patients Design: Prospective observational study Setting: Academic pediatric tertiary referral center Study Population: Children aged less than 18 years with PICCs inserted in Interventional Radiology from January 2019 to June 2019 Outcome Measures: Number of catheters remaining in situ until completion of intended therapy; and for those removed prematurely, the type and rate of complications Results: A total of 88 PICCs (40 uncuffed, 48 cuffed) were inserted in 77 children. Overall, 72% (n = 63) of all catheters remained in situ until intended therapy was completed. Complications resulting in premature removal occurred in 24% of catheters (rate of 3.89/1000 catheter-days). Complications included catheter malfunction (2.04 per 1000 catheter-days), infection (1.67 per 1000 catheter-days), and thrombosis (0.18 per 1000 catheter-days). Complications were further recorded by catheter type. In patients with uncuffed catheters, the overall complication rate was observed to be 6.74 per 1000 catheter-days. In patients with cuffed catheters, the overall complication rate was observed to be 1.10 per 1000 catheter-days. Conclusions: Findings suggest that cuffed PICCs may provide additional benefits toward optimizing catheter performance and securement in neonatal and pediatric patients. This can contribute to improved likelihood of complication-free PICC therapy and successful therapy completion. Pediatric patients present unique challenges and considerations for clinicians planning PICC therapy. Additional studies are needed to identify effective strategies to mitigate catheter failure in neonatal and pediatric populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Association for Vascular AccessSame topicCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisFrench-language works237,207