MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Q-Learning-Based SCMA for Efficient Random Access in mMTC Networks With Short Packets

2021· article· en· W3189457666 on OpenAlexaff
Duc‐Dung Tran, Shree Krishna Sharma, Symeon Chatzinotas, Isaac Woungang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNetwork packetRandom accessComputer networkTransmission (telecommunications)Code (set theory)TelecommunicationsSet (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In massive machine-type communications (mMTC) networks, the ever-growing number of MTC devices and the limited radio resources have caused a severe problem of random access channel (RACH) congestion. To mitigate this issue, several potential multiple access (MA) mechanisms including sparse code MA (SCMA) have been proposed. Besides, the short-packet transmission feature of MTC devices requires the design of new transmission and congestion avoidance techniques as the existing techniques based on the assumption of infinite data-packet length may not be suitable for mMTC networks. Therefore, it is important to find novel solutions to address RACH congestion in mMTC networks while considering SCMA and short-packet communications (SPC). In this paper, we propose an SCMA-based random access (RA) method, in which Q-learning is utilized to dynamically allocate the SCMA codebooks and time-slot groups to MTC devices with the aim of minimizing the RACH congestion in SPC-based mMTC networks. To clarify the benefits of our proposed method, we compare its performance with those of the conventional RA methods with/without Q-learning in terms of RA efficiency and evaluate its convergence. Our simulation results show that the proposed method outperforms the existing methods in overloaded systems, i.e., the number of devices is higher than the number of available RA slots. Moreover, we illustrate the sum rate comparison between SPC and long-packet communications (LPC) when applying the proposed method to achieve more insights on SPC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207