Dynamic Vehicle Routing with Parking Probability under Connected Environment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In downtown areas of large cities, it is very challenging for drivers to find available parking spots, even when they are provided with information on parking availability and location information. To overcome this challenge, this paper develops a dynamic vehicle routing system to search for the optimal routes for connected vehicles to find parking spots successfully and to minimize total trip time, including driving time and walking time. The system predicts the probability of each parking lot having available parking spots based on the existing available number of spots and the vehicle arrival and departure rates collected by connected vehicles. This probability is integrated in the search for vehicle routes to minimize total travel and walking times. Numerical experiments indicate that the proposed system can reduce the cruising time spent searching for available parking spots, and the total trip time can be reduced by up to 24%. In addition, the system can decrease the number of re-routing decisions, which reduces the stress of drivers on the road. A sensitivity analysis of the parking probability is also conducted. Some future work based on the proposed system is proposed in the conclusion to this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it