Cancer mortality in relatives of desmoid sarcoma patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desmoid sarcoma patients from the U.S. and Canada, diagnosed under the age of 16 years and referred to the University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Hospital - MDAH - between 1944 and 1975 were surveyed. Family information was collected for grandparents, parents, parental siblings, proband offspring and siblirtgs. Expected mortality was calculated by applying age-race-sex specific U.S. mortality rates to the person-years at risk. Standardized mortality ratio's - SMR- were calculated. Among 429 relatives of 26 desmoid sarcoma probands no overali cancer excess was found, observed/expected = 13/24.7. The risk among parents, the ones more informative for genetic analysis were also not significant, observed/expected = 2/1.83. An updated follow-up of incidence data of the study population and of the general population is suggested in the years to come, and in doing so, the inclusion of all familly members history should pull the results to a number closer to reality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".