Textural Evolution of 6061 Aluminum Alloy Processed by Accumulative Roll-Bonding Process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A commercial Al-Mg-Si alloy (AA 6061) was deformed by using the accumulative roll bonding (ARB) process for up to five cycles at ambient temperature. The evolution of texture in this process was studied by the X-ray diffraction (XRD) method. Experimental results indicate that the combination of the shear texture composed of Rotated cube {001} component and the rolling textures that included Copper {112} and Dillamore {4, 4, 11} components developed after the first cycle. During the first cycle, the shear texture was developed as a result of shear deformation induced by high level of friction between the rolls and the sheet. By increasing the number of cycles, the shear texture strength diminished and changed to the rolling texture. After the fifth cycle, a remarkable increase in the rolling texture intensity was observed due to homogenous deformation induced by the presence of fine non-shearable particles. Additionally, the presence of magnesium in solid solution influenced the texture evolution during ARB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".