Immunoglobulin for preventing respiratory syncytial virus infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Respiratory Syncytial virus, the most important cause of lower respiratory tract infections in infants and young children in industrialized countries, is associated with increased morbidity in premature infants with or without bronchopulmonary dysplasia as well as those with congenital heart disease. Because of observations that lower rates of disease occur immediately after birth, presumably due to vertical transmission of maternal antibody, and animal studies where protection from pneumonia was observed through administration of immune globulin, the efficacy of passive prophylaxis in premature infants has been studied. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis was performed to assess the effects of polyclonal respiratory syncytial virus hyperimmune globulin or monoclonal antibody in preventing RSV hospitalization, receipt of intensive care, mechanical ventilation, and mortality in those with underlying prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or congenital heart disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections trials register and MEDLINE in March, 1999. In addition, abstracts on these topics were sought from the Pediatric Academies Meetings and the Intersciences Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy for the years 1994 to 1997, inclusive. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized, controlled trials of prevention of RSV using immune globulin, respiratory syncytial virus immune globulin, or monoclonal RSV antibody in children with prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia or congenital heart disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently abstracted data and assessed study quality. Only incidences could be pooled because data for durations was summarized in a manner that did not allow combining results across the studies. MAIN RESULTS: Four studies with a total of 2598 subjects were included in the main analysis. All were randomized controlled trials. Two trials were not blinded. Three studies examined RSV hyperimmune globulin and one examined monoclonal RSV antibody. A study of a different monoclonal RSV antibody could not be included because it has not been presented or published. The pooled Peto Odds Ratios favoring prophylaxis were 0.48 (95% CI 0.37, 0.64), 0.47 (0.29, 0.77), and 0.99 (0.48, 2.07) for incidence of hospitalization, incidence of ICU admission, and incidence of mechanical ventilation, respectively. The numbers needed to prevent one hospitalization and one ICU admission are 17 and 50 respectively. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: RSVIG is effective in preventing RSV hospitalizations and admission to the intensive care unit, but not in preventing mechanical ventilation. There was a non-significant trend towards a higher mortality in children given RSVIG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".