IMPLEMENTASI CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITYBERDASARKAN KONSEP TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE PT BANK SYARIAH XYZ TAHUN 2018,2019 dan 2020
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Companies in enhancing a good image or image need social thinking which is not only concerned with seeking profit only in the business world. All social activities are carried out by corporate social responsibility. Therefore this research was conducted to determine the implementation of corporatesocial responsibility (CSR) carried out by PT Bank Syariah XYZ. The sample of this research is the financial performance report of PT Bank Syariah XYZ using quantitative research and data analysis techniques using the measurement of the Triple Bottom Lineconcept of PT Bank Syariah XYZ in 2018, 2019 and Q3 2020 with the EVA (Economic Value Added) method. The results obtained from this study are that the EVA number always has a positive tendency or is greater than zero, as a result it proves that CSR activities have an influence on Value added for entrepreneurs. The results of this triple bottom line measurement have been tested to be able to assess whether or not there is an EVA from the CSR of PT Bank Syariah XYZ which produces benefits from year to year. XYZ Syariah Bank annually throughout 2017–3rd quarter 2020.Keywords: Corporate Social Resposibility, Triple Bottom Line, Economic Value Added
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it