MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3190670641 · doi:10.1183/23120541.00447-2021

An open-label study of the tolerability and potential efficacy of memantine for treating refractory chronic cough

2021· article· en· W3190670641 on OpenAlexafffund
Rayid Abdulqawi, Imran Satia, Kimberley Holt, Rachel Dockry, Shilpi Sen, John A. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueERJ Open Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory and Cough-Related Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversitySt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchMcMaster UniversityAlfaisal UniversityWellcome TrustMedical Research CouncilWellcome
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityRefractory (planetary science)Chronic coughMemantineAnxietyDepression (economics)AnesthesiaInternal medicineNMDA receptorAdverse effectReceptorPsychiatryAsthma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Refractory chronic cough (RCC) is defined as cough lasting longer than 8 weeks either in the absence of an identifiable underlying cause or that remains resistant to treating any potential underlying causes [1]. Affected patients have a poor quality of life and suffer from fatigue, disturbed sleep, incontinence, frustration, anxiety, and depression [2]. Despite being a debilitating condition, no licensed treatment is available. Blocking NMDA receptors with memantine in refractory chronic cough patients is poorly tolerated and demonstrates no improvement in cough

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueERJ Open ResearchSame topicRespiratory and Cough-Related ResearchFrench-language works237,207