MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3190767940 · doi:10.34133/2021/9806201

Classification of Soybean Pubescence from Multispectral Aerial Imagery

2021· article· en· W3190767940 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Phenomics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceMultispectral imagePrincipal component analysisSupport vector machineCultivarNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexTest setMathematicsPattern recognition (psychology)CartographyComputer scienceGeographyHorticultureBiologyBotanyLeaf area index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accurate determination of soybean pubescence is essential for plant breeding programs and cultivar registration. Currently, soybean pubescence is classified visually, which is a labor-intensive and time-consuming activity. Additionally, the three classes of phenotypes (tawny, light tawny, and gray) may be difficult to visually distinguish, especially the light tawny class where misclassification with tawny frequently occurs. The objectives of this study were to solve both the throughput and accuracy issues in the plant breeding workflow, develop a set of indices for distinguishing pubescence classes, and test a machine learning (ML) classification approach. A principal component analysis (PCA) on hyperspectral soybean plot data identified clusters related to pubescence classes, while a Jeffries-Matusita distance analysis indicated that all bands were important for pubescence class separability. Aerial images from 2018, 2019, and 2020 were analyzed in this study. A 60-plot test (2019) of genotypes with known pubescence was used as reference data, while whole-field images from 2018, 2019, and 2020 were used to examine the broad applicability of the classification methodology. Two indices, a red/blue ratio and blue normalized difference vegetation index (blue NDVI), were effective at differentiating tawny and gray pubescence types in high-resolution imagery. A ML approach using a support vector machine (SVM) radial basis function (RBF) classifier was able to differentiate the gray and tawny types (83.1% accuracy and kappa = 0.740 on a pixel basis) on images where reference training data was present. The tested indices and ML model did not generalize across years to imagery that did not contain the reference training panel, indicating limitations of using aerial imagery for pubescence classification in some environmental conditions. High-throughput classification of gray and tawny pubescence types is possible using aerial imagery, but light tawny soybeans remain difficult to classify and may require training data from each field season.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it