MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Two-Phase Immersion Cooling of Microprocessors with Electroplated Porous Heat Spreaders: Thermal Performance and Reliability

2021· preprint· en· W3190777708 on OpenAlex
Chady Al Sayed, Omidreza Ghaffari, Yaser Nabavi Larimi, Francis Grenier, Simon Jasmin, Luc G. Fréchette, Julien Sylvestre

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceThermal resistanceBoilingJunction temperatureComputer coolingHeat pipeHeat spreaderPhase-change materialComposite materialWater coolingHeat sinkThermal management of electronic devices and systemsThermalHeat transferMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We conducted a thermal performance and reliability study of a new two-phase cooling prototype that localizes the cooling over a CPU, after enhancing the top side of its exposed integrated heat spreader with a 500-micron thick Multi-Scale Electroplated Porous coating. The cooling prototype used 280 mL of Novec™ 7000 dielectric fluid and 237 m <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> /h of airflow. Junction-to-air thermal resistance measurements were performed with the boiling occurring directly over a standard nickel-plated integrated heat spreader, as well as on the modified heat spreader. When compared to boiling over the unmodified CPU, boiling over the electroplated CPU lowered the junction-to-air thermal resistance by 56% at the lowest power dissipation and by 51% at the highest power dissipation (109.5±1.7) W. The lowest junction-to-air thermal resistance of (0.225±0.003)°C/W was achieved over the modified heat spreader at (109.5±1.7) W, compared to (0.436±0.006)°C/W for the unmodified CPU. The cores temperature was also reduced by 18.1°C and 26.4°C at (41.6±0.2) W and (109.5±1.7) W power, respectively. The highest cores temperature for the CPU with modified heat spreader was only 45.4°C at (109.5±1.7) W. This demonstrates the performance improvement potential when optimizing the standard integrated heat spreaders of processors for cooling by immersion in dielectric fluids. No significant differences were observed for the inside pressure of the systems between the two boiling surfaces, suggesting that the nature of the boiling surface does not affect the build-up pressure inside such closed cooling systems. Cooling prototypes with the modified heat spreaders underwent reliability tests, with their CPU being repeatedly stressed to maximum power for 15 minutes and then put in an idle state for the same duration, a total of 2000 times (1000 hours). No change to the pressure or degradation in the thermal performance was recorded, suggesting that the sealing mechanism is reliable and prevents air infiltration over extended periods of use. The electroplated surface presented no visible damage to its structure, thus suggesting that the proposed localized two-phase cooling technology can achieve both high thermal performance and reliable operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207