MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

LUGARES RURAIS E ESPACIALIZAÇÃO DO CAPITAL: O AIRBNB COMO EVIDÊNCIA DAS URBANIDADES NO RURAL EM UM ESPAÇO EM GLOBALIZAÇÃO

2021· article· pt· W3190916039 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGEOgraphia · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpatializationHumanitiesContext (archaeology)Capital (architecture)Political scienceGeographySociologyArtAnthropologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O artigo pretende discutir uma particular maneira de espacialização do capital. Para isso, analisa a presença do Airbnb enquanto elemento na produção de espacialidades rurais, constituindo-se em uma evidência de urbanidades no rural num contexto de globalização e planetarização do urbano, tomando-se como exemplo o município de Nova Friburgo, no estado do Rio de Janeiro. Demonstra-se como o espaço se integra e, ao mesmo tempo em que se desafiam as análises dicotômicas existentes, reafirmam-se assimetrias. Destaca-se como a presença de redes técnicas intensificam e aceleram um processo de inserção do lugar rural na escala global, através do seu modelamento para o consumo (como uma representação de espaço de lazer e turismo “antiurbano”, porém, permeado de urbanidades) e sua apropriação por empresas globais, das quais o Airbnb é um exemplo. Palavras-chave: espacialização do capital, urbanidades no rural, Airbnb, planetarização do urbano, globalização. RURAL PLACES AND THE SPATIALIZATION OF CAPITAL: AIRBNB AS AN EVIDENCE OF URBANITIES ON RURAL AREAS IN A GLOBALIZED SPACE Abstract: The article intends to discuss a particular way of spatialization of capital. It analyzes the presence of Airbnb as an element in the production of rural spatialities, constituting an evidence of urbanities on rural areas in a context of globalization and planetarization of the urban, analyzing, as an example, the municipality of Nova Friburgo - RJ. It demonstrates how the space is integrated and, at the same time that the existing dichotomous analyzes are challenged, old asymmetries are reaffirmed. It stands out how the presence of technical networks intensifies and accelerates a process of insertion of the rural place on a global scale, through its modeling for consumption (as a representation of leisure space and “anti-urban” tourism, however, permeated with urbanities) and its appropriation by global companies, whose Airbnb is an example. Keywords: spatialization of capital, Airbnb, urbanities on rural areas, planetarization of the urban, globalization. LIEUX RURALES ET ESPACIALISATION DU CAPITAL: L'AIRBNB COMME UNE EVIDENCE DES URBANITÉES EN MILLIEU RURAL SOUS UN ESPACE EN MONDIALISATION Resumé: L'article entend évoquer un mode particulier de spatialisation du capital et, pour cela, il analyse la présence d'Airbnb comme élément de production de spatialités rurales, constituant une évidence d'urbanités en milieu rural dans un contexte de mondialisation et de planétarisation de l'urbain, en prenant, à titre d'exemple, la municipalité de Nova Friburgo, dans l'état de Rio de Janeiro. Il montre comment l'espace est intégré et, en même temps que les analyses dichotomiques existantes sont remises en question, les asymétries sont réaffirmées. Il surligne aussi comment la présence de réseaux techniques intensifie et accélère un processus d'insertion du lieu rural à l'échelle mondiale, à travers sa modélisation pour la consommation (comme représentation de l'espace de loisirs et du tourisme «anti-urbain» pourtant imprégné d'urbanités) et son appropriation par des entreprises mondiales, dont Airbnb est un exemple. Mots-clés: spatialisation du capital, urbanités en milieu rural, Airbnb, planétarisation de l'urbain, mondialisation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it