MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191131139 · doi:10.1109/icc42927.2021.9500250

DSO: An Intelligent SFC Orchestrator for Time and Resource Intensive Ultra Dense IoT Networks

2021· article· en· W3191131139 on OpenAlexaff
Mahzabeen Emu, Salimur Choudhury

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOrchestrationQuality of serviceDistributed computingResource (disambiguation)Resource allocationInternet of ThingsComputer networkWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Among the massive pool of Internet of Things (IoT) devices in network function virtualization (NFV) context, the urgency for efficient service orchestration is constantly growing. The emerging challenges can be addressed as collaborative optimization of resource utilities and ensuring Quality-of-Service (QoS) with prompt orchestration in dynamic, congested, and resource-hungry IoT networks. Traditional mathematical programming models are NP-hard, hence inappropriate for time sensitive IoT scenarios. This paper promotes the need to go beyond the realms and propose an intelligent Deep Q-Network (DQN) driven service function chain (SFC) orchestration, named as DSO hereafter. We further equip this proposed DSO model with the notion of sharing the flow of already deployed network function rather than urging a new instantiation. The sharing conceptualization improves resource utilization, and DQN is employed for adaptive, robust, and swift orchestration. Our extensive simulation results demonstrate the remarkable capability and adaptability of the proposed DSO model for cutting back running time (≈ 10 hours) and ensuring near-optimal resource utilization across extremely dense IoT substrate network settings. Thus, this research can be regarded as a pioneering tread to scale down massive IoT resource fabrication costs, upgrade profit margin for providers, and sustain QoS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207