REVIEW ON: NEVSKAYA, T.A., ZVEREVA, K.A. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS ON THE NORTH CAUCASUS IN THE 18TH – THE FIRST QUARTER OF THE 20TH CENTURY: FROM THE TRADITIONAL SELF-RULE TILL THE SOVIET LEGAL SYSTEM. STAVROPOL: NORTH CAUCASIAN FEDERAL UNIVERSITY, 2019. 184 P.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Дан анализ содержания монографии, в которой рассматривается эволюция демократических институтов у славянского населения Северного Кавказа. В рецензии приведена характеристика положений и выводов авторов монографии относительно развития традиционного самоуправления, организации выборов в различные органы власти и административные структуры. Положительной оценки заслуживает то, что подняты вопросы обычного права крестьян и казаков, а также показана специфика дворянского самоуправления на Северном Кавказе. На конкретных примерах рассмотрен процесс внедрения советской правовой системы, вытеснившей традиционные правовые институты. Приведены также замечания относительно содержания монографии. The content of the monograph is analyzed, which examines the evolution of democratic institutions among the Slavic population of the North Caucasus. The review provides a description of the presumptions and conclusions of the authors of the monograph regarding the development of traditional self-government, the organization of elections to various authorities and administrative structures. The fact, that the questions of the common law of peasants and Cossacks are raised in the research, deserves positive appraisal, the specifics of the noble self-government in the North Caucasus are also shown. The process of introducing the Soviet legal system, which supplanted traditional legal institutions, was examined via relevant examples. The contents of the monograph are commented in the review.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.093 | 0.059 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".