MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191392132 · doi:10.1002/ehf2.13539

Neutrophils Pro-Inflammatory and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Release in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

2021· article· en· W3191392132 on OpenAlexafffund
Diana Chaar, Benjamin L. Dumont, Branka Vulesevic, Paul‐Eduard Neagoe, Agnès Räkel, Martin G. Sirois, Michel White

Bibliographic record

VenueESC Heart Failure · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitut de Cardiologie de Montréal
KeywordsMedicineEjection fractionHeart failureInterquartile rangeInternal medicineInflammationCytokineEndocrinologyProinflammatory cytokineTumor necrosis factor alphaImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is characterized by sub-clinical inflammation. Changes in selected biomarkers of inflammation concomitant with the release of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines by neutrophils have not been investigated in patients with HFrEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two patients, aged 68.8 ± 1.7 years, with HFrEF and left ventricular ejection fraction 28.7 ± 1.0%, and 21 healthy controls (CTL) were recruited. Twenty-five HF patients had type 2 diabetes. Venous blood samples from HF and CTL were collected once. Neutrophil-derived pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine levels were assessed in plasma by ELISA. Plasma biomarkers assessed included: C-reactive protein (CRP), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukins (IL)-6, -8, -1 receptor antagonist (-1RA), nitric oxide (NO), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVCAM-1) and E-Selectin (sE-Sel). Neutrophils were isolated and stimulated with various agonists to promote VEGF, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1RA release. Compared with CTL, HFrEF patients showed a marked decrease in circulating VEGF [178.0 (interquartile range; IQR 99.6; 239.2) vs. 16.2 (IQR 9.3; 20.2) pg/mL, P ≤ 0.001] and NO [45.2 (IQR 42.1; 57.6) vs. 40.6 (IQR 30.4; 47.1) pg/mL, P = 0.0234]. All other circulating biomarkers were significantly elevated. Neutrophils isolated from patients with HFrEF exhibited a greater IL-8 release in response to LPS [1.2 ± 0.1 (CTL); 10.4 ± 1.6 ng/mL (HFrEF) and 12.4 ± 1.6 ng/mL (HFrEF and DM), P ≤ 0.001]. IL-6 release in response to LPS was not changed in HFrEF patients without diabetes, whereas it was significantly increased in patients with HFrEF and diabetes [46.7 ± 3.9 (CTL) vs. 165.8 ± 48.0 pg/mL (HFrEF), P = 0.1713 and vs. 397.7 ± 67.4 pg/mL (HFrEF and DM), P ≤ 0.001]. In contrast, the release of VEGF and IL-1RA was significantly reduced in HFrEF (VEGF; TNF-α: 38.6 ± 3.1 and LPS: 25.3 ± 2.6 pg/mL; IL1RA; TNF-α: 0.6 ± 0.04 and LPS: 0.3 ± 0.02 ng/mL) compared with CTL (VEGF; TNF-α: 60.0 ± 9.4 and LPS: 41.2 ± 5.9 pg/mL; IL1RA; TNF-α: 3.3 ± 0.2 and LPS: 2.3 ± 0.1 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HFrEF exhibit a significant decrease in circulating VEGF. The release of VEGF and both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines from the stimulated neutrophils is markedly altered in these patients. The clinical significance of these findings deserves further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESC Heart FailureSame topicCardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingFrench-language works237,207