LSTM-Based Channel Access Scheme for Vehicles in Cognitive Vehicular Networks With Multi-Agent Settings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we study the channel access problem of vehicles in a cognitive radio vehicular network, where each vehicle opportunistically accesses the channel resources of the primary network in order to successfully receive the necessary data packets within a time deadline. Given the access priority constraint and the limited bandwidth of the primary network, a smart channel connection scheme is indispensable to ensure a decent quality of service (QoS) at the vehicles’ side. Due to the competitive nature of vehicles, the vehicle access control is formulated as a multi-agent access problem that comes with an intrinsic challenge, i.e. the partial observation of the information about the environment dynamics. On top of that, considering the temporal usage profile of the primary network, the environment dynamics are also time-dependant, and hence making the aforementioned access control a non-Markovian problem. Consequently, the estimation of the system states, which are used for the decision making process of a vehicle, is very challenging. To deal with the issues arising from such non-Markovian problem, we propose a vehicle connection algorithm based on a deep recurrent Q-learning network. With the aid of a recurrent Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) layer integrated into a deep Q-network, the time-correlated system states can be properly estimated, thereby improving the vehicle channel access policy. Besides, we introduce novel reward quantities that help improving the network performance and the capability to flexibly adapt to unexplored scenarios. A new structure of the cumulative reward function is also presented to balance the performance trade off between the cooperative and competitive objectives. Simulation results are provided to verify the advantage and the stability of our proposed algorithm over the benchmark schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".