MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3191520970 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-734367/v1

The Impact of the Delta Change Approach on the Severity of Ice-jam Flooding Under Future Climate Scenarios

2021· preprint· en· W3191520970 on OpenAlexaffabout
Apurba Das, Prabin Rokaya, Karl‐Erich Lindenschmidt

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsGlobal Institute for Water SecurityUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlooding (psychology)DeltaClimate changeEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementNatural resource economicsClimatologyEconomicsGeologyPsychologyEngineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Projection of the impact of future climate on ice-jam flood intensity is an essential component of a flood mitigation strategy for many northern communities. General Circulation Model (GCM) outputs are used to derive hydrological conditions under future climate scenarios. Although GCMs are often downscaled to a point of interest, there can still be significant differences between modelled climate scenarios and historically observed climate scenarios. Therefore, the model-indicated changes between baseline and future values of climatic scenarios are applied to observed baseline values to estimate projected future values. This can be carried out by using the delta change method which is an approach for adjusting GCM output. This study evaluates the impact of the delta change method on the frequency and severity of ice-jam flooding under a future climate scenario. The Athabasca River at Fort McMurray is presented as the test site. Streamflow conditions were derived from a physically-based hydrological model, Modélisation Environnementale communautaire-Surface Hydrology (MESH), by forcing the Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM) driven by the Third Generation Coupled Climate Model (CGCM3) for both baseline (1971–2000) and future (2041–2070) periods. Streamflow under future climatic conditions was developed based on the delta change method for both absolute and relative changes. The adjusting streamflow was then used in a fully dynamic river ice hydraulic model, RIVICE, to project future ice-jam scenarios using a stochastic modelling framework. Finally, the impact of the delta changes on the frequency and severity of simulated ice-jam flooding was assessed by producing ice-jam stage-frequency distributions (SFDs) under future climatic conditions. The results indicate that there is a notable difference in the projected frequency and severity of ice-jam flooding between absolute and relative change approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→