MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3191587271

Infrastructural architecture: social design for the public realm in underground transit systems

2019· dissertation· en· W3191587271 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mackenzie Parr

Bibliographic record

VenueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealmArchitecturePublic transportTransit (satellite)Transit systemUrban designArchitectural engineeringEngineeringPolitical scienceTransport engineeringGeographyArchaeologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There’s a certain allure and poeticism to mass transit, from buses, to streetcars, and trains. It’s curious that a strictly infrastructural marvel of engineering houses such an honest and diverse application of shared architecture, mutual in it’s urban scope. In many ways, the architecture of these utilitarian transit spaces (subways most notably), are comparable in their role to that of the public square, court, or forum. There is an untold architectural relationship within these urban environments between subways as a space of movement, and as a place of activity. This thesis aims to re-examine subways under this lens. To posit that subways offer more to the urban fabric than a functional vessel for movement, and are indeed vital at providing opportunity for social life to flourish in an urban context. Questions of democratizing space, spatial legitimacy, functionalism, and the dichotomy between space and place, arise when examining these constructs of subterranean infrastructure. These relationships will be explored by studying and reimagining a particular site along the City of Toronto’s subway system, specifically; Spadina Station. It is the intersection of both the University-Yonge Line, the Bloor Line, as well as the terminal to the Spadina Avenue streetcar. The key methods of research for this study include studying, drawing, and photographing the space to better understand it’s prescriptive needs, and to inform a modified architectural response and proposal. Ultimately, this project aims to be didactic in its thinking with regards to infrastructural architecture through proposal work. The core of transit is the people who use it, and it must be understood that these people interact socially with their surroundings, far beyond just the isolated motions of coming and going. We must ask how utilitarian infrastructure can shift it’s functional role in cities to reclaim the public realm as a space of communal activity, and shared program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.025
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)Same topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207