Controlled single and repeated impact testing for material plastic behaviour characterisation under high strain rates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Instrumented single‐shot experiments provide crucial information of a material's response to impact events that can be used in shot‐peening modelling. However, no authors successfully used such test for constitutive model identification and validation as existing test rig generally cannot provide an accurate determination of the shot trajectory in three dimensions over a wide velocity range. In this work, a shot‐peening test rig that can propel single shot under the process conditions with a high aiming accuracy is presented. The test rig propels industrial shot by sudden pressurised gas release. A methodology to recover the propelled shot three‐dimensional trajectory within a 200‐μm accuracy using two high‐frequency cameras is developed in an open‐source in‐house code. The test rig can propel 0.5‐, 1.19‐ and 2.5‐mm‐diameter shot at velocity ranging from 0.8 to 143 m s −1 and can send several shots at the same position when using the largest shot diameter. Two potential applications of the set‐up are presented for (i) coefficient of restitution measurement with different shooting angles and velocities and (ii) crystal plasticity finite element model validation using the impact dent topology, the shot displacement curve and the crystal misorientation field under the dent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it