MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192039469 · doi:10.1155/2021/8153474

Moving Camera-Based Object Tracking Using Adaptive Ground Plane Estimation and Constrained Multiple Kernels

2021· article· en· W3192039469 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tao Liu, Yong Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHigher Education Discipline Innovation ProjectChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceTracking (education)Tracking systemGround planeKalman filterKernel (algebra)Image planeVideo tracking3D pose estimationPoseTrack (disk drive)Noise (video)Object (grammar)Image (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Moving camera-based object tracking method for the intelligent transportation system (ITS) has drawn increasing attention. The unpredictability of driving environments and noise from the camera calibration, however, make conventional ground plane estimation unreliable and adversely affecting the tracking result. In this paper, we propose an object tracking system using an adaptive ground plane estimation algorithm, facilitated with constrained multiple kernel (CMK) tracking and Kalman filtering, to continuously update the location of moving objects. The proposed algorithm takes advantage of the structure from motion (SfM) to estimate the pose of moving camera, and then the estimated camera’s yaw angle is used as a feedback to improve the accuracy of the ground plane estimation. To further robustly and efficiently tracking objects under occlusion, the constrained multiple kernel tracking technique is adopted in the proposed system to track moving objects in 3D space (depth). The proposed system is evaluated on several challenging datasets, and the experimental results show the favorable performance, which not only can efficiently track on-road objects in a dashcam equipped on a free-moving vehicle but also can well handle occlusion in the tracking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207