MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3192090877 · doi:10.1101/2021.08.09.455743

Dose-dependent dissociation of pro-cognitive effects of donepezil on attention and cognitive flexibility in rhesus monkeys

2021· preprint· en· W3192090877 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed A. Hassani, Sofia Lendor, Adam Neumann, Kanchan Sinha Roy, Kianoush Banaie Boroujeni, Kari L. Hoffman, Janusz Pawliszyn, Thilo Womelsdorf

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMemory and Neural Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsDonepezilCognitive flexibilityPsychologyPrefrontal cortexNeuroscienceStriatumCognitionNeurochemicalNeurochemistryPerseverationAcetylcholineAcetylcholinesterasePharmacologyChemistryMedicineDopamineInternal medicineNeurologyDementia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Donepezil exerts pro-cognitive effects by non-selectively enhancing acetylcholine (ACh) across multiple brain systems. The brain systems that mediate pro-cognitive effects of attentional control and cognitive flexibility are the prefrontal cortex and the anterior striatum which have different pharmacokinetic sensitivities to ACh modulation. We speculated that these area-specific ACh profiles lead to distinct optimal dose-ranges for donepezil to enhance the cognitive domains of attention and flexible learning. METHODS To test for dose-specific effects of donepezil on different cognitive domains we devised a multi-task paradigm for nonhuman primates (NHPs) that assessed attention and cognitive flexibility. NHPs received either vehicle or variable doses of donepezil prior to task performance. We measured donepezil intracerebral and how strong it prevented the breakdown of ACh within prefrontal cortex and anterior striatum using solid-phase-microextraction neurochemistry. RESULTS The highest administered donepezil dose improved attention and made subjects more robust against distractor interference, but it did not improve flexible learning. In contrast, only a lower dose range of donepezil improved flexible learning and reduced perseveration, but without distractor-dependent attentional improvement. Neurochemical measurements confirmed a dose-dependent increase of extracellular donepezil and decreases in choline within the prefrontal cortex and the striatum. CONCLUSIONS The donepezil dose for maximally improving attention functions differed from the dose range that enhanced cognitive flexibility despite the availability of the drug in the major brain systems supporting these cognitive functions. Thus, the non-selective acetylcholine esterase inhibitor donepezil inherently trades improvement in the attention domain for improvement in the cognitive flexibility domain at a given dose range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMemory and Neural Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→