MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192124868

Programa psicoeducativo con enfoque humanista y bienestar psicológico en un grupo de personas adultas mayores institucionalizadas

2021· article· es· W3192124868 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicAging, Health, and Disability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPersonaPsychologyMental healthGerontologyMedicineArtPsychotherapist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolResumen: El objetivo de este programa psicoeducativo con enfoque humanista es fortalecer el bienestar psicologico en un grupo de personas adultas mayores institucionalizadas. Durante la etapa adulta ocurren transformaciones biologicas, sociales y economicas que tienen un efecto en el bienestar psicologico. El contar con recursos que brinden la posibilidad de satisfacer las propias necesidades es un aspecto clave para lograr la salud mental. El programa consiste en 11 sesiones con duracion de 50 minutos, con frecuencia de dos reuniones por semana. Dirigido a hombres y mujeres entre los 65 anos y mas, que se encuentren en una institucion. Metodologia: Participantes voluntarios/as. El diseno propuesto es de corte cuasiexperimental con mediciones pre y pos evaluacion. Ademas, se propone una entrevista en profundidad con uso de grabaciones y bitacora. Los instrumentos propuestos: Escala de Bienestar Psicologico de Riff; Mini Mental Examination Test, y Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). Se toman en cuenta las consideraciones eticas y el consentimiento informado. Palabras claves: Envejecimiento, adulto mayor institucionalizado, bienestar psicologico. EnglishAbstract: The objective of this psychoeducational program with a humanistic approach is to strengthen psychological well-being in a group of institutionalized older adults. During the adult stage, biological, social and economic transformations occur that have an effect on psychological well-being. Having resources that provide the ability to meet your own needs is a key aspect of achieving mental health. The program consists of 11 sessions lasting 50 minutes, with a frequency of two meetings per week. Aimed at men and women between the ages of 65 and over, who are in an institution. Methodology: Volunteer participants. The proposed design is quasi-experimental with pre and post evaluation measurements. In addition, an in-depth interview is proposed with the use of recordings and a log. The proposed instruments: Riff's scale of psychological well-being, Mini Mental Examination Test and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). Ethical considerations and informed consent are taken into account. Keywords: Aging, institutionalized older adult, psychological well-being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it