MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MP19-02 IMPAIRED EMOTIONAL, PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL WELL-BEING IN RADICAL CYSTECTOMY PATIENTS

2021· article· en· W3192283218 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julie G. Trudel, Conrad Maciejewski

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCystectomyQuality of life (healthcare)Bladder cancerPhysical therapyDistressUrinary diversionEmotional distressSurvivorship curveCancerClinical psychologyInternal medicinePsychiatryAnxietyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

You have accessJournal of UrologyHealth Services Research: Practice Patterns, Quality of Life and Shared Decision Making II (MP19)1 Sep 2021MP19-02 IMPAIRED EMOTIONAL, PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL WELL-BEING IN RADICAL CYSTECTOMY PATIENTS Julie Trudel, and Conrad Maciejewski Julie TrudelJulie Trudel More articles by this author , and Conrad MaciejewskiConrad Maciejewski More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002004.02AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Radical cystectomy (RC) can have a negative impact on the patients emotional, physical and social well-being along the illness trajectory. There is a paucity of studies examining the Health-related Quality of life (HRQOL) of bladder cancer patients before RC. This study evaluated the HRQOL of RC patients before and after surgery. METHODS: RC patients were enrolled in the Diana Wood Cancer Survivorship Clinic at the Ottawa Hospital from January 2019. Questionnaires were completed prior to and 2-3 months post RC. Validated HRQOL instruments were used: FACT-Bl, SF-36 and Distress Thermometer (DT). Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed Rank Tests were performed to determine changes in HRQOL scores. RESULTS: 54 RC patients completed HRQOL measures before and after RC. Mean age was 67 years (SD: 9.7 years); 67% were men, 61% underwent an ileal conduit diversion. Clinically significant pre-post differences were seen in medians for four SF-36 scale scores. Lower post-cystectomy scores were obtained in: Physical Functioning” (p=0.00), “Role limitations due to Physical Health” (p=0.00), “Energy/Fatigue” (p=0.01) and “Social Well-Being” (p=0.02). Clinically significant differences were also found for DT scores. Patients exhibited more emotional distress before RC (p=0.005) and more physical concerns after RC (p=0.007). FACT-Bl results correspond with those obtained with SF-36 and DT. Moreover, after RC, younger patients (<65 years) were less content with their social life and the older ones (≥65 years) exhibited more fatigue. Neo-bladder patients cited more physical problems after RC including urinary, sexual, gastro-intestinal concerns and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Emotional distress is often reported before RC and physical concerns are frequently identified after RC. Older patients and neo-bladder diversions encountered more physical problems after RC. Cancer survivorship needs in RC patients must be tailored to patients age and urinary diversion to optimize HRQOL outcomes. Source of Funding: The Diana Wood Bladder Cancer Survivorship Program © 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 206Issue Supplement 3September 2021Page: e327-e327 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2021 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Julie Trudel More articles by this author Conrad Maciejewski More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207