The mediating effects of coworker trust on incivility, psychological safety, and satisfaction among nursing professionals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Incivility and psychological safety are related to employee relationships, work performance and wellbeing (Lim, Cortina Magley, 2008; Carmeli, Brueller and Dutton 2009). Trust is a central component to the development of positive interpersonal relationships and the social environment has a strong influence on employee satisfaction (Utriainen Kyngas, 2009; Tyler, 1996). The present study examined the role trust plays in the relationship between nurse's experiences of their social environment and their satisfaction at work. Surveys were completed by 1015 nursing staff across four Canadian health care organizations. Results revealed that coworker trust mediated the negative relationship between coworker incivility and job satisfaction. Trust was also found to mediate the positive relationship between psychological safety and satisfaction in the nursing population. Findings contribute to the current nursing literature surrounding the adverse effects of incivility in the workplace as well as expand on the benefits of establishing psychological safety in the workplace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it