MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192622549 · doi:10.1017/s031716710050016x

Response to Lessard et al.

2000· article· fr· W3192622549 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Shasi Seshia, Jeanne Teilelbaum, Bryan D. Young

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2000
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Apheresis Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apnea test in the diagnosis of brain deathGuidelines for the diagnosis of brain death have been recently published by the Canadian Neurocritical Care Group in the Journal.' Apnea testing is an important component in the determination of brain death.In the recent guidelines it is suggested to insufflate 100% oxygen via a cannula inserted in the endotracheal tube to prevent hypoxemia during the apneic period.This is in agreement with the classic method of apnea testing.However, we would like to warn about serious complications of such a technique of apneic oxygenation.A few years ago we experienced a case of subcutaneous emphysema, tension pneumothorax followed by 'cardiac arrest during the performance of an apnea test with the classic method of inserting an oxygen catheter into the endotracheal tube.Subsequent investigation revealed that the oxygen catheter was wedged in the endotracheal tube.The 6 1/min flow of oxygen rapidly produce lung hyperinflation and major barotrauma.More recently, two very simitar eases have been very well described by Bar-Joseph et al. 2 Brandsetter et al 3 have also reported a similar complication.The consequences of such complications can be catastrophic, especially when the patient is a candidate for organ donation.Moreover, they could be easily prevented by simple modification of the technique of apnea testing.The first important step is to ensure a careful preoxygenation with 100% oxygen while maintaining normoventilation (PaCO 2 40±5mmHg) during at least 10 minutes.Then the endotracheal tube can be connected either to a T-piece or to a high flow continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) system.If the patient required a FiO 2 less than 0.50 prior to apnea testing, a T-piece system delivering 100% oxygen will suffice to maintain an adequate arterial oxygenation throughout the apneic period.Alternatively, if prior to apnea testing the patient has hypoxic respiratory failure requiring a high FiO 2 , the endotracheal tube can be connected to a high flow CPAP system of 5 to 10 CffiHjQ delivering 100% oxygen.Practically, we use a PEEP valve (Vital Signs®, Totowa, N.J.) that we adapt to the distal extremity of the T-piece.A similar but more complex technique, the "bulk diffusion" technique, has also been described by Al Jumah et al. 4 With these techniques the risk of barotrauma and tension pneumothorax is minimal and probably entirely eliminated.Therefore, we suggest that the Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Brain Death should be amended to revise the technique of apnea testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0320.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicOrgan Donation and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207